On Wednesday, September 19, 2001 at 0815, Ian Taniguchi, a marine biologist with the California Department of Fish and Game, Daniel "Herb" Leedy, a Fisheries Biologist with the Minerals Management Service, and I, acting as the MMS Regional Divemaster, boarded the 32-foot charter vessel Solara, at Santa Barbara Harbor. During the one the one-hour cruise up the coast to Las Flores Beach, between El Capitan State Beach and Refugio State Beach, the seas were calm and the typical coastal overcast hung over the water and land. It seemed the perfect metaphor for the nebulous gloom that hung over the country just days after the attacks on the twin towers of the World Trade Center.
I was familiar with Las Flores Beach. My friends and I would go diving off that beach. We would park on the side of the southbound lanes of US 101 opposite the "Refugio Beach 1 Mile" sign, schlep our gear across the railroad tracks, navigate through an opening in the fence, cross the bike path that connected the two beaches, slide down the bluff to the beach, and gear up to enter the water. Going by boat was definitely easier and much more civilized.
I was familiar with Las Flores Beach. My friends and I would go diving off that beach. We would park on the side of the southbound lanes of US 101 opposite the "Refugio Beach 1 Mile" sign, schlep our gear across the railroad tracks, navigate through an opening in the fence, cross the bike path that connected the two beaches, slide down the bluff to the beach, and gear up to enter the water. Going by boat was definitely easier and much more civilized.
The Ellwood Field, probably in the 1940s. From http://goletahistory.com/ellwood-gas-station/ |
Today, we were diving on modern oil field infrastructure--the nearshore rock boulder armor covering of Exxon's Santa Ynez Unit's Platform Hondo to Las Flores Canyon pipeline and power cable conduit. The offshore platforms were provided power from the mainland electrical grid via the power cable. This configuation to power the structures had been favored by regulators concerned about the air quality impacts if on-platform diesel generators were the primary source of power. The power cable had experienced a failure and needed to be repaired which meant the boulder armor rock covering it needed to be removed. Therein lay the problem and the reason for our dive today.
From http://ashtabulatimes.blogspot.com
|
In August 2001, a pre-construction marine biological survey was completed in the nearshore area for the project. During the initial survey, a single abalone, assumed to be a white abalone or Sorensen’s abalone (Haliotis sorenseni) found the armor rock in 22 feet of water approximately 50 feet shoreward of the conduit terminus. I was not surprised at the find; this area was colloquially known by local divers as “abalone acres.” The specimen was not removed but the white peripodium and highly convex shell with three elevated respiratory pores were characteristic of the white abalone. The abalone has been listed as an endangered species just a few months earlier.
White or Sorenson's abalone (Haliotis sorenseni) |
Threaded abalone ((Haliotis assimilis) |
We head for the marker buoy to start our descent. |
Captain Skee Linowitz, Solara’s skipper, placed a marker buoy at the coordinates provided by Mr. Ray deWit. With Ian Taniguchi leading, we entered the water from the vessel and descended to the bottom following the buoy line. The team then proceeded north toward the armor rock covering which rises several feet from the ocean floor and forms an artificial reef. I located the abalone, having dived that location many times in the late 1980s to the mid-1990s. It had moved little from the position described by Mr. de Wit. Ian observed the abalone and took photographs of the critter while Herb and I conducted a thorough search of the adjacent armor rock reef for other abalone. We but found none. While positive identification could not be made without removing the abalone for closer inspection, which would have been a technical violation of the Endangered Species Act, Ian and Herb concluded the organism was most likely a white abalone. All I knew is that it was not a red, pink, or black abalone.
The entire dive took 32 minutes and we never exceeded a depth of 31 feet. We had found what we had come for and done what we had planned to do--confirm the presence of what could be a white abalone. The California Department of Fish and Game and others would decide which
action, if any, should be taken regarding further identification of the
organism, including possible harvesting for a captive breeding program to
aid in the specie's recovery.
The decision was to conduct an expanded marine biological survey which was completed in April
2002. By that time, I had moved to Alaska, so I was not part of that effort. As described in MMS and California Coastal Commission documents, the expanded survey was performed specifically to 1)
characterize the habitats and dominant macroepibiota of the nearshore project
area and to 2) locate and identify any abalone within two areas. The areas were
east and west of the conduit corridor, approximately 825 feet long by 800 feet
wide, respectively, and centered on the terminus.
The
second survey did not find the initial white abalone; however, an empty shell
that matched the characteristics of the shell of the single individual was
found near its original location. Matching external characteristics of the
shell with video taken during the August 2001 survey and pictures in the September 2001 recon strongly suggested it was
the same animal. The shell was retrieved and it has been confirmed that the individual
was a white (hybrid) abalone. A single mature sea otter was also observed at the site and
it is possible that the sea otter had eaten the abalone individual during the
period between the two surveys. The second survey located 21 additional abalone one of which
was thought to be a H. sorenseni. This white abalone was located in about 25
feet of water about 600 feet from the conduit terminus near the base of an isolated boulder.
- Cooperation between state and federal bureaus in doing field work to inform decision making is essential.
- An ocean-management bureau should have scientists trained as divers.
- Local knowledge and experience is important in designing reconnaissance parameters.
- Otters and abalone are contrary critters and can confound the best intentioned efforts of lawmakers and bureaucrats.
- Ocean management is a long-time horizon activity with lots of variability and uncertainty (its not like counting cattle in range management), interest groups and decisions which invite judicial intervention in decision making.
- Nature always bats last.
No comments:
Post a Comment